l know this is a contentious subject but having watched the SA/Scotland game, were Scotland played well, SA seemed to have a few players making up the numbers.

Yeah, there is still transformation in SA rugby.

Which, as u know, means that there SHOULD be a number of coulored players in the squad.

At the moment there really is a whole bunch of coulered players that really plays great rugby, that this does not have such a negative effect as it did from 2000 to mid 2003.

But having said that, l am not sure what went wrong yesterday.

Except maybe for Brian Mujati & Earl Rose all of the other players in the squad r arguably the best SA has to offer.

They just r not having as a great tour as was hyped earlier. But they still got the win & did their country proud :)

The Springboks have traditionally had sluggish end of year tours anyway so no big surprise with this result. They are still picking up the wins so they must be fairly happy.

SA always play poorly in the UK. There are still a few black fellas making up the numbers but most of them are there because they are damn good rugby players. Go the BEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEAST!!!!!!

to be honest l hate how South Africa have this policy in thier national sports yet alone rugby where they have to have a certain amount of black players present or playing in the team.

You should be picking teams based on talent & skill rather than clour.

The only time they should have this non colour discriminatory policy is in their development teams or junior teams which if they DID they would not have this problem in the first place in thier senior national teams.

Politics have no place in sport, and you are seeing the result of too much of it in SA Rugby.